Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: define pre-release software

  1. #1
    platinum NNTP User

    Default define pre-release software

    should those who are updating every day from the KDE factory repo
    cease cluttering up all the normal forums and instead put their
    moanings about what is broken _today_ into the pre-release/beta forum?

    i mean, to me, if it is not part of the community RELEASED version it
    is by definition pre-release software..

    so, what is 'released' now, openSUSE 11.1, with KDE4.1 and . . .

    could we get a clear definition of pre-release software?

    like, is Chrome 'released'?

    --
    platinum

  2. #2

    Default Re: define pre-release software

    In principle, you're right...

    But personally, I'd say this one falls firmly onto the lap of KDE. If they hadn't decided to call their beta (4.1) a general release, SUSE wouldn't have felt forced to stick it in 11.1, and we wouldn't be in this mess.

    What proportion of KDE 11.1 users do you reckon are still running 4.1? Probably forum users are an unrepresentative sample, but I'd still say it's low...

    Extenuating circumstance, for the forum, and for the users. Still might make sense to have a clarification from the staff. Then again, might not.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    The English Lake District. UK - GMT/BST
    Posts
    36,857
    Blog Entries
    20

    Default Re: define pre-release software

    We don't need to be overly pedantic about this. If a user comes here with a running 11.1 install, he doesn't expect unhelpful argumentation about such matters. I'm running 4.3.1 of kde, but I don't consider it a pre-release beta OS because of that. kde4.3.1 is a stable release from kde and the factory repo I use is, and I quote: KDE4:/Factory:/Desktop/openSUSE_11.1/
    Tumbleweed_KDE
    My Articles Was I any help? If yes: Click the star below

  4. #4
    platinum NNTP User

    Default Re: define pre-release software

    caf4926 wrote:
    > the factory repo I use is, and I quote:
    > KDE4:/Factory:/Desktop/*openSUSE_11.1*/



    i'm not fighting, just asking: do you therefore define all factory
    repos as containing post pre-release software? or just the KDE factory?

    --
    platinum

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    West Yorkshire, UK
    Posts
    3,611

    Default Re: define pre-release software

    You could of course define pre-release software as software which will be in 11.2 but for which there is no 11.1 version - that would of course be a moving target until feature freeze.

  6. #6
    platinum NNTP User

    Default Re: define pre-release software

    john hudson wrote:
    > You could of course define pre-release software as software which will
    > be in 11.2 but for which there is no 11.1 version - that would of course
    > be a moving target until feature freeze.


    personally, i think it better to remove the 'moving target' problem by
    defining "pre-release softwar"e as any software not released in the
    current supported versions (currently, those are 10.3, 11.0 & 11.1)..

    --
    platinum

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,500

    Default Re: define pre-release software

    Quote Originally Posted by caf4926 View Post
    We don't need to be overly pedantic about this. If a user comes here with a running 11.1 install, he doesn't expect unhelpful argumentation about such matters. I'm running 4.3.1 of kde, but I don't consider it a pre-release beta OS because of that. kde4.3.1 is a stable release from kde and the factory repo I use is, and I quote: KDE4:/Factory:/Desktop/openSUSE_11.1/
    It could be argued that repo is similar to a backport repo. If you agree, would you then classify the current backport repos, for 11.1 kde or gnome, as either pre-release or (semi-)officially supported for the current release?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    The English Lake District. UK - GMT/BST
    Posts
    36,857
    Blog Entries
    20

    Default Re: define pre-release software

    Quote Originally Posted by platinum View Post

    i'm not fighting, just asking: do you therefore define all factory
    repos as containing post pre-release software? or just the KDE factory?

    --
    platinum
    Define: Post pre-release
    Is it like Post pre-natal?
    Tumbleweed_KDE
    My Articles Was I any help? If yes: Click the star below

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,500

    Default Re: define pre-release software

    Quote Originally Posted by john_hudson View Post
    You could of course define pre-release software as software which will be in 11.2 but for which there is no 11.1 version - that would of course be a moving target until feature freeze.
    You could, but as said you create a moving target. Also the user seeking help, probably under some stress, wouldn't be thinking of "feature freeze" on say 11.2, when he is running 11.1.

    I see a way through by approaching the original question from a different viewpoint i.e. the user running the current release of openSUSE.

    openSUSE provides many repos specifically for 11.1, and publishes their details on the wiki, presumably in the expectation that they will be used for that purpose. Even the "official" Oss and Non-Oss repos have been known to contain beta software, but it is released by openSUSE for users. Those packages are usuaully dealt with as released, and dealt with in the Applications section of the forum. I see no fundamental difference with any of the repos published for the 11.1 release, from the users' viewpoint.

    Anything outside of those wiki-published 11.1 repos, can be dealt with as pre-release e.g. 11.2. The key is the repo source, and users can draw a clear line, by reference to the wiki. Of course the forum is then free to deal in any thread with expectations involving "at own risk" as is often pointed out for wiki-published repos.

    I therefore propose this approach with the necessary changes to the forum section headers e.g Pre-Release should redefine on Milestones and perhaps remove old references to alpha/beta/rc S/W. This approach has the benefit of aligning the forum with the wiki.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •