Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Naming conventions

  1. #1

    Question Naming conventions

    I was reading "Good project- and archive- naming practice", and the use of major.minor.patch numbering.

    I often see additional numbers after the patch, for example only, "gimp-2.4.6-1.3.i586.rpm". Sometimes those numbers after the patch ("-1.3") are the only thing that is different in multiple entries in the search results. I know what the "gimp-2.4.6" means. I know what the "i586.rpm" means, but what does the "-1.3" mean? If it isn't a new release, a minor update or a patch, what is it?

    When looking at SuSE repositories, what is the significance of a directory with and without a colon, like MONO/ and MONO:/, PRINTING/ and PRINTING:/ or SUSE:/, etc?

    Thank you.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Groningen, Netherlands
    Posts
    19,763
    Blog Entries
    14

    Default Re: Naming conventions

    AFAIK the last of the numbering are for minor fixes and patches.

    I don't know about the colons in the naming of the repos. So far I wondered, but have regarded it as some kind of puzzle, of which, one day, I will find the logic behind .
    ° Appreciate my reply? Click the star and let me know why.

    ° Perfection is not gonna happen. No way.

    https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Board#Members
    http://en.opensuse.org/User:Knurpht
    http://nl.opensuse.org/Gebruiker:Knurpht

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Moscow, Russia
    Posts
    3,001
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Naming conventions

    First number meens change in source -- new patch, changes in spec-file, etc. Second number meens build. Every change of first number resets second number to 1.

    Directories without colons are projects in OBS. In directories with colons are their subprojects.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •