Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: GNOME is not MONO =)

  1. #1

    Thumbs up GNOME is not MONO =)

    Hi,

    After reading lots of websites where it's said that GNOME is deeply connected with Mono, I went like I'd no longer install that DE. But, I thought the best I could do is installing it on my own machine. I did a detailled install, checked if any mono component was marked and if it was even recomended, I unchecked it.

    Then as I started the system for the first time, an error about Tomboy's applet launched, I just clicked delete it and no problems. So, there is no mono component installed on my machine, and that makes me feel good, since I am not interested in C# (I'm a C++/C guy preparing for learning python) nor .NET.

    Regards.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Bangalore, India
    Posts
    365

    Default Re: GNOME is not MONO =)

    Admins, move this thread to Soapbox.

  3. #3

    Default Re: GNOME is not MONO =)

    Quote Originally Posted by freedguy View Post
    Admins, move this thread to Soapbox.
    Hi,
    I don't think this needs to be moved there because I am just telling my experience. I know a few people who are affraid of Mono because it implements the .NET technology and may saying around, but I have nothing against it, I just come to prefer good old C or C++.

    Regards.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Schenectady, NY
    Posts
    138

    Default Re: GNOME is not MONO =)

    Quote Originally Posted by freedguy View Post
    Admins, move this thread to Soapbox.
    I agree with this sentiment.

    There's nothing magical about running without mono, or pulseaudio, or beagle, or moonlight, or flash, or emacs, etc.

  5. #5

    Default Re: GNOME is not MONO =)

    Quote Originally Posted by kdemello View Post
    I agree with this sentiment.

    There's nothing magical about running without mono, or pulseaudio, or beagle, or moonlight, or flash, or emacs, etc.
    I know there isnt any magical, but after reading things like this: Boycott Novell GNOME-Mono Dependency Revisited (Updated) I wanted to make sure how true it was. That's all.

    By the way I use GNOME alot too.

    Regards.

  6. #6
    J0e3gan NNTP User

    Cool Re: GNOME is not MONO =)

    Quote Originally Posted by RicardoVarasSantana View Post
    Hi,
    I don't think this needs to be moved there because I am just telling my experience. I know a few people who are affraid of Mono because it implements the .NET technology and may saying around, but I have nothing against it, I just come to prefer good old C or C++.

    Regards.
    Right. I know a lot of people who are scared of C because it implements the abstraction technology and C++ because it implements the object-oriented technology; and .NET's runtime technologies are even scarier, huh? How silly.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    1,273

    Default Re: GNOME is not MONO =)

    Quote Originally Posted by RicardoVarasSantana View Post
    Hi,
    I don't think this needs to be moved there because I am just telling my experience.
    Hi Recardo,

    I do think your story is of value.. but to be fair, 'it ain't no question'.. so Chit-chat or soapbox would be the fitting place to post these conclusions.

    Back to your post.. Mono integration can be a thing to watch out for.. and then mainly those bits of mono that could be infringing on patents. It would be a big mistake if a DE would ' fall' if for some reason MONO (partly) gets pulled and the DE then seems to have been built on parts of the code that have been pulled.

    Don't applications like Beagle, Banshee and F-Spot also rely on mono components?

    Curious,
    Wj
    Have a lot of fun!

  8. #8

    Default Re: GNOME is not MONO =)

    Magic31 is absolutely correct. Beagle, Banshee, Tomboy, Muine, and F-Spot all depend on Mono and are in all likelihood written in C#. They're all listed at:

    Screenshots - Mono

    On the other hand I wouldn't avoid Gnome because some applications written for it are in C#. Like the poster I too can also program in C/C++, but I have to admit that the combination of .NET and Visual Studio is sometimes really nice to have. I automated a lot of tasks at work using this platform. The nice thing about it is that you can slap a useful application together in no time at all.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •