|
||||||
| Forums FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Tech News Breaking and important technical news developments |
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
openSUSE 11.1 (x86_64) with KDE 4.3.0 (Release 158) on MacBook Pro |
|
||||
|
Quote:
This is about the real problem: if I order a copy of Windows XP, MS charges me € 134,=. My regular IT shop offers the same computers incl. XP for under € 250,= , excl. XP for € 210,= There's no way the IT shop is financing the difference, so it must be some other party in the deal. An odd discrepancy. During the last couple of years many big construction companies in the Netherlands have been heavily penalized for 'under the counter' price arrangements. A comparison between what these companies were trialled for and MS's pricing policy has been made a couple of times on tv and in the press. What's being investigated now is this matter: If you don't sell all your hardware with our OS on it, we'll change our prices for what you do sell. And the last sentence, I could not agree more. And yes, even if it's partly for emotional reasons (we'll show you our laws first, and you stick to them like any other company). I hope this is only a start. Maybe one day, a newly bought computer boots with one menu (figures are fictional): Select OS to install: - Windows 7 ( € 134,= license fee ) - OSX ( € 159,= license fee ) - Ubuntu Linux ( no charges ) - openSUSE Linux (no charges ) - Other Linux The machine would then download an image and perform an automated install finishing with the creation of a first user.
__________________
- AMD Athlon X2 6.0 GHz, 8 GB DDR2-800, 30 GB SSD, 1.5 TB, EVGA 9800GT, openSUSE 11.2 RC2 KDE4 4.3.2 - ASUS K70IO laptop, GT120M-1GB, 4 GB, 64 GB SSD, opensuse Factory, KDE4 4.3.2 There's one in every cloud...So leave the cloud in peace. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
You have a point about the analogy, since you intended it to be nonsensical to prove a point. An emoticon may have helped, but it's easy to forget that one's closing remarks are often more fresh in readers' minds when they reply. Either way, we obviously thought it was a bad analogy.
|
|
||||
|
On 2009-06-14 06:46:01 -0400, Chrysantine
<Chrysantine@no-mx.forums.opensuse.org> said: > > kastorff;1999017 Wrote: >> Well, I'm allowed to laugh at the EU all I want. Each to their>> opinion. > Actually the consensus I've seen so far has been pretty positive from > inside the IT people based in Europe. > > If you go and read some US based media, you'll see instant backlash and > attacks against EU - there's even a "Down with Opera!" boycott movement, > "surprisingly" enough started by a US based site. Actually, I was just expressing my personal opinion. I don't really care how many folks I can line up behind me. I'd suspect, however, that there's a significant number of people in the world who see it as I do, and a significant number of people who don't. I just read what comes my way about the subject, and form an opinion. > > I was hoping they'd make Microsoft pull out of Europe completely - that > would be worth a bottle of high quality liquor or two. Indeed. I'd drink to that. See that's something that would really make Microsoft address the reality of how much the EU hates them and simply will not let go of their issues until they have real satisfaction. And it would force the EU to act like a professional organization, and come up with some serious _current_ justification for their current crusade. -- Keith Kastorff |
|
||||
|
On 2009-06-14 10:06:01 -0400, consused
<consused@no-mx.forums.opensuse.org> said: > > kastorff;1999017 Wrote: >> ...Well, I'm allowed to laugh at the EU all I want. Each to their>> opinion... > Let's clear that one up. Of course, you can laugh yourself silly about > anything you wish to. If you read carefully you will notice I commented > on the situation, and wouldn't address you as "it" in any case. That needed clearing up? We actually have Laugh Police? Wow. ![]() > > You have a point about the analogy, since you intended it to be > nonsensical to prove a point. An emoticon may have helped, but it's easy > to forget that one's closing remarks are often more fresh in readers' > minds when they reply. Either way, we obviously thought it was a bad > analogy. ![]() Hey, I'm not perfect. I thought the analogy was silly. Silly was the point I was trying to make. But if we all focus on technically how we each say something, as opposed to focusing on what we're trying to communicate, it gets much more difficult for everyone. I think most folks will understand. -- Keith Kastorff |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
On 2009-06-14 14:16:02 -0400, consused
<consused@no-mx.forums.opensuse.org> said: > > kastorff;1999552 Wrote: >> ...See that's something that would really make >> Microsoft address the reality of how much the EU hates them and simply >> will not let go of their issues until they have real satisfaction... > You mean let go of their issues and acquiesce just like the US > government have? Hmm. ![]() No, that's not what I meant. I do hope the interpretive gyrations didn't hurt too much...I know how much work it must have been to link the two together. ![]() -- Keith Kastorff |
|
|||
|
It's not difficult when based on what actually took place.
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
I agree with the example you make, its a pity some people don't understand the point of the example you made. Guys lets be honest, is it necessary to punish a company for being successful. i mean at the end of the day one has a choice to install what ever software they need on their system that they see as best. What if microsoft shipped without IE and an installer application to install other applications. What then??? |
![]() |
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|