|
||||||
| Forums FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Surveys/Polls Share opinions about various topics |
| View Poll Results: Which bittorrent client should be defaulted for GNOME? | |||
| I'm happy with the current choice of client - Monsoon |
|
7 | 22.58% |
| Bittorrent-gtk |
|
0 | 0% |
| gnome-btdownload |
|
0 | 0% |
| Transmission |
|
13 | 41.94% |
| Deluge |
|
4 | 12.90% |
| I don't care which one it is, as long as it works |
|
5 | 16.13% |
| I don't use BT |
|
2 | 6.45% |
| Voters: 31. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Hello!
openSUSE 11.0 and 11.1 came with Monsoon as their default bittorrent client for the GNOME-desktop; now seems a good time to review whether this choice was a success with the openSUSE users. What do you think? Should openSUSE stick with Monsoon, do you want another default BT-client or don't you care or know? See FunkyPenguin's original presentation page from early 2008 for infos on the clients in this poll. Remember; default BT client is the one you get upon installing openSUSE - other clients can always be installed afterwards. |
|
|||
|
If there are particular reasons why you don't want the current default, please mention them. Similarly, if there are particular reasons why a different client would be better than the current one, those would definitely be worth hearing.
|
|
|||
|
Monsoon keeps crashing on me. Also, the download status never seems to be updated, so each time I restart I have to recheck them - which takes a while.
Now, for all I know, this may be fixed easily. I don't know. But I'm just a desktop user, and not a very techy one at that. |
|
|||
|
While not a truly active openSuSE user, I do load it from time to time to check out where the distro has gotten to, usually with an eye to similarities and differences between Fedora and Ubuntu.
I would prefer Transmission as the default openSuSE BitTorrent client for the following reasons: (1) I have enjoyed using the client since early 2006; (2) I prefer Transmission's low-resource-use, no-bloat design discipline; (3) I like the transmission-daemon being controllable from command line (transmission-remote), webui, or gui Qt client (experimental, presently called qtr); (4) Transmission is extremely robust and reliable; and (5) Sorry, but I cannot feel good about any mono app because I have been at this stuff since 1981 and I *know* Micros**t will inevitably and ineluctably do what they have always done, if and when mono becomes inextricably entangled with any linux apps and/or distros. The scorpion and the frog. Oh, and (6) Transmission works well in KDE 4, which I also hope will become the openSuSE default, but that's a different poll |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| bittorrent, choice, default, monsoon, torrent |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|