|
||||||
| Forums FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Soapbox Strong opinions about mostly anything (no political or religious content) |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
I never really have any trouble with it. Happy here
__________________
Box: openSUSE 11.2 | (KDE4.3.3) | M2N4-SLI | AMD 64 X2 5200+ | nVidia 8500GT | 4GB RAM Lap: openSUSE 11.2 | Celeron 550 | (KDE4.3.3)"3" | Intel 965 GM | Lenovo R61e | 3GB RAM |
|
||||
|
They must be out to only get me. I can see their team meetings now. All focusing on me, LMAO.
__________________
Once you install a modem, the government can look into your computer and watch everything you do! That's why every night before I go to bed, I turn the monitor to the wall. |
|
||||
|
Flash is really one of the most ugly pieces of tech I've ever seen. It has a horrible performance too. Why would you need ~60% CPU power just to watch a small youtube video for example? It's horrible, often buggy and often makes browsers crash on specific sites
__________________
My site: http://microchip.bplaced.net My repo: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/microchip8 SUSE Unbound Forum: http://suseunbound.lefora.com Do coders dream of sheep() ? |
|
||||
|
I recall long before adobe acquired macromedia and flash that every new release of the plugin actually brought performance and feature improvements. I frequented flash video and animation sites long before they became popular, and I always enjoyed trying out a new version of the plugin, and seeing a video or game play better with less CPU usage.
Then adobe came in and sh*t all over everything. I remember thinking, after the first adobe release of flash, that it was a huge step backwards. My old, reliable pentium III struggled with even the smallest, lowest resolution video, whereas before I could have 4 different browser windows open, each with a different video or game playing at the same time. I stuck with the last macromedia version of flash for as long as possible but eventually I had to "upgrade" (read: downgrade) to the new version a year after the acquisition. Each subsequent version of flash that adobe has released, imo, has been very wishy-washy. Sometimes things get better, other times they get horribly worse, with the latter being more frequent. I will admint that Linux flash support has more or less improved from where it was two-three years ago, but Windows releases have been consistently bad. I'd say the Windows and Linux flash plugins are about equal in terms of reliability and performance, which is funny since Windows is the "preferred" platform most development is done on. I had to replace my old PIII (my parents were using it as their main machine) because Web browsing became too much for it to handle because of all of the flash thrown around the Web. If I removed the flash plugin, despite the warning messages I would get, the machine would run just as well as it did when it was new. Unfortunately my parents needed to use some flash applications. I had two choices: buy an expensive video card upgrade for an old, nearly obsolete machine, or build them a new one. I went with the latter since the video card would have only helped marginally, while a new machine would last them longer. I am still amazed that, of all things, flash was the reason I had to replace an otherwise perfectly usable computer.
__________________
My personal philosophy: The only way you won't find something is if you stop looking. |
|
|||
|
While flash is a great big stinking pile, i'd double check the paths to where your plugins are stored. Sounds like you have a duplicate of the lib for flash, remove one (or better rename it) and see how well it works.
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|