60,000 Forum Members

We have 60,000 memebers. :slight_smile:

http://storage3.static.itmages.ru/i/11/0706/s_1309946808_d2e10c3272.png](http://itmages.ru/image/view/225943/d2e10c32)

On 07/06/2011 12:36 PM, Lazy Kent wrote:
>
> We have 60,000 memebers. :slight_smile:

true, if a person signs in, makes one post and never comes back should
be called a ā€œmemberā€.

ā€“
DD
-Caveat-Hardware-Software-

  • DenverD wrote, On 07/06/2011 12:49 PM:
    > true, if a person signs in, makes one post and never comes back should be called a ā€œmemberā€.

Party pooper! :slight_smile:

It can be considered a milestone regardless of the number of posts. Or would you prefer criteria such as ā€œat least ten postsā€ or ā€œmultiple threads?ā€

On 07/06/2011 04:36 PM, chief sealth wrote:

> It can be considered a milestone regardless of the number of posts. Or
> would you prefer criteria such as ā€œat least ten postsā€ or ā€œmultiple
> threads?ā€

what is the purpose of a statistic if there is no meaning or usefulness
in it?

i mean, you correctly note that just counting ā€œmembersā€ is of no value
unless it has some meaningā€¦like, which is more meaningful: 100
members who who come twice every day and help others, or 100,000
ā€˜membersā€™ who post one question, get answers and never come backā€¦not
even to say thank you?

how about instead of 60k members, we crow about 1,019,039 posts, and
counting?

or, even more meaningful:

  • 250,000 questions answered, or
  • 2,000 bugs reported, or
  • like that

ā€“
DD
-Caveat-Hardware-Software-

We canā€™t expect everyone is eager to help others.

Not bad, but 60000 is an indicator that people are finding and using the forums in high numbers, and itā€™s a good yardstick.

On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 14:58:19 +0000, DenverD wrote:

> how about instead of 60k members, we crow about 1,019,039 posts, and
> counting?

Because surely then someone would start asking if that includes the spam
posts that have been deleted. Canā€™t please everyone.

Itā€™s just a fun number; thereā€™s no need to rain on the parade. :slight_smile:

Jim

Jim Henderson
openSUSE Forums Administrator
Forum Use Terms & Conditions at http://tinyurl.com/openSUSE-T-C

On 07/06/2011 08:06 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> Itā€™s just a fun number; thereā€™s no need to rain on the parade. :slight_smile:

you are right, it is as ā€˜funā€™ a number as the rack up made by distrowatchā€¦

and, just as meaningfulā€¦

ā€“
DD
-Caveat-Hardware-Software-

On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 18:19:26 +0000, DenverD wrote:

> On 07/06/2011 08:06 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> Itā€™s just a fun number; thereā€™s no need to rain on the parade. :slight_smile:
>
> you are right, it is as ā€˜funā€™ a number as the rack up made by
> distrowatchā€¦
>
> and, just as meaningfulā€¦

More meaningful, in my view, for the reason chief sealth said (itā€™s an
indicator that people are finding the forums - and Iā€™d add, taking the
time to register, which usually is an indicator they have an interest in
at least asking a question).

Jim

Jim Henderson
openSUSE Forums Administrator
Forum Use Terms & Conditions at http://tinyurl.com/openSUSE-T-C

60.000 is as debatable as 50.000, as 40.000 and so on. All numbers are debatable. Yet, personally I regard this as another virtual milestone that the community has passed. Celebrating ā€œa lotā€, or ā€œgrowth in a non-descriptive wayā€ donā€™t mean anything either.

So: congrats to all of us !!! Cheers

Hi
Also we are running about 8% active membership which is higher than
other forums :wink:

Congratulations on another openSUSE Forum milestone :slight_smile:

ā€“
Cheers Malcolm Ā°ĀæĀ° (Linux Counter #276890)
openSUSE 11.4 (x86_64) Kernel 2.6.37.6-0.5-desktop
up 18:21, 3 users, load average: 0.12, 0.08, 0.13
GPU GeForce 8600 GTS Silent - Driver Version: 270.41.19

On 2011-07-06 20:29, Jim Henderson wrote:
> More meaningful, in my view, for the reason chief sealth said (itā€™s an
> indicator that people are finding the forums - and Iā€™d add, taking the
> time to register, which usually is an indicator they have an interest in
> at least asking a question).

But they might be registering for something else different than the forum:
it is a common register for all.

ā€“
Cheers / Saludos,

Carlos E. R.
(from 11.4 x86_64 ā€œCeladonā€ at Telcontar)

On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:38:06 +0000, Carlos E. R. wrote:

> On 2011-07-06 20:29, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> More meaningful, in my view, for the reason chief sealth said (itā€™s an
>> indicator that people are finding the forums - and Iā€™d add, taking the
>> time to register, which usually is an indicator they have an interest
>> in at least asking a question).
>
> But they might be registering for something else different than the
> forum: it is a common register for all.

But the forum counter only counts people who actually access the forum.

IOW, itā€™s not a counter of Novell Login registrations, is explicitly a
count of user IDs that have accessed the forum specifically. When you
access the forum the first time, the username info (and a little other
info) is pulled into the vBulletin database.

Thatā€™s the record thatā€™s counted. Novellā€™s website has far, far more
than 60,000 people registered in it.

Jim

ā€“
Jim Henderson
openSUSE Forums Administrator
Forum Use Terms & Conditions at http://tinyurl.com/openSUSE-T-C

On 06/07/2011 11:36, Lazy Kent wrote:
> We have 60,000 memebers. :slight_smile:
>
> ā€˜[image:
> http://storage3.static.itmages.ru/i/11/0706/s_1309946808_d2e10c3272.png]ā€™
> (http://itmages.ru/image/view/225943/d2e10c32)

Presumably that doesnā€™t count those of us who prefer using
nntp://forums.opensuse.org/ ?

On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 17:11:25 +0000, Chris Hills wrote:

> On 06/07/2011 11:36, Lazy Kent wrote:
>> We have 60,000 memebers. :slight_smile:
>>
>> ā€˜[image:
>> http://storage3.static.itmages.ru/i/11/0706/[/color]
s_1309946808_d2e10c3272.png]ā€™
>> (http://itmages.ru/image/view/225943/d2e10c32)
>
>
> Presumably that doesnā€™t count those of us who prefer using
> nntp://forums.opensuse.org/ ?

If you link your NNTP credentials to your web credentials, it does.

Jim

ā€“
Jim Henderson
openSUSE Forums Administrator
Forum Use Terms & Conditions at http://tinyurl.com/openSUSE-T-C

On 23/07/2011 18:35, Jim Henderson wrote:
> If you link your NNTP credentials to your web credentials, it does.

I donā€™t have any credentials. I read and post anonymously (with regards
to authentication).

On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 17:41:34 +0000, Chris Hills wrote:

> On 23/07/2011 18:35, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> If you link your NNTP credentials to your web credentials, it does.
>
> I donā€™t have any credentials. I read and post anonymously (with regards
> to authentication).

I didnā€™t mean you authenticate to the NNTP server - but you link the e-
mail address in your posting profile to your Novell/openSUSE Login.
Thereā€™s an item in the FAQ about how to do this so your posts count in
the statistics.

Jim

ā€“
Jim Henderson
openSUSE Forums Administrator
Forum Use Terms & Conditions at http://tinyurl.com/openSUSE-T-C