openSUSE Forums > General Chit-Chat » Not a good start for Ubuntu Karmic

Go Back   openSUSE Forums > General Chit-Chat
Forums FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


General Chit-Chat A friendly place to converse about your adventures with openSUSE, your weekend, your boss, your new car, and generally stuff that doesn't fit somewhere else (and we must ask: PLEASE do not post help questions here)

Reply
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 03-Nov-2009, 15:57
Jonathan_R's Avatar
Busy Penguin
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 479
Jonathan_R hasn't been rated much yet
Default Re: Not a good start for Ubuntu Karmic

As I was reading the article and the various posts in this thread, I was reminded of one thing. The importance of beta testing. See, now that Karmic is released, more people are downloading it and installing/upgrading to it.

This is why I fought so hard to have the sub-forum Pre-Release/Beta
See, that was my idea back before we merged. But it's not enough for users to download alpha and beta versions and then complain about it in the forum. The idea was to troubleshoot. to do some debugging and file bug reports.

So while you all wonder if 11.2 is going to have this same issue, ask yourself this....have you participated in the alpha and beta testing? If the answer is NO, then you do have plenty to worry about. If the answer is YES, then very little to worry about.

You see, your involvement does matter. I don't blame Canonical for this. I blame the community. Canonical can only do so much. They rely on the testers to file bug reports. The more testers, the more bug reports, and the more things get fixed. Kinda funny how that works.

I see a lot of users complaining, but not a lot of users doing something. We're always going to have complainers and whiners. That's just life. But those of us that can, should rise above and not complain but do. Together as a community, we can debug, we can solve things. We can even be ingenuitive, and come up with ideas and even make it work. We are a community, and when we function together toward a purpose, there is no stopping us.

So it's up to you. Complain and whine, or get up and do something.
__________________
My site, a portal to other sites. The Complete Computer Resource: http://thecompletecomputerresource.com/

If you want packages built, ask me. I'll either do it, or get someone else to. If they are not already built.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 03-Nov-2009, 17:56
GofBorg's Avatar
Parent Penguin
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Delta Quadrant
Posts: 782
GofBorg hasn't been rated much yet
Default Re: Not a good start for Ubuntu Karmic

> So it's up to you. Complain and whine, or get up and do something.
> '' (http://forums-opensuse.provo.novell....-release-beta/)


Well I'm running 11.2 RC2 at home with the legacy 173.X drivers that I
downloaded off nVidia's site on Sunday and it works fine. Not seeing
any issues. Keep in mind I do not use desktop effects, but I did have them
on for awhile and I did not see any issues. It wasn't snappy, but the card
is just a simple little PCI job (no, not PCIe, PCI).


Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 03-Nov-2009, 18:14
TioDuke's Avatar
Puzzled Penguin
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 48
TioDuke hasn't been rated much yet
Default Re: Not a good start for Ubuntu Karmic

What's your xorg-server version?
__________________
"All truths wait in all things,
They neither hasten their own delivery nor resist it" -- Walt Whitman
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 03-Nov-2009, 21:25
Sagemta's Avatar
Parent Penguin
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 601
Sagemta hasn't been rated much yet
Default Re: Not a good start for Ubuntu Karmic

I've been testing since M5 overall it has been problem free. The only real biggie to date has been when the Xorg1.7 no longer needed the xorg.conf & the devs removed sax for a bit. For me so far that's been the biggest problem. Even then it has only been a problem on my PC that uses the openchrome driver,VIA chipsets do that. I needed sax2 for it. So overall it looks like OpenSuse 11.2
will be excellent.
However, there's no accounting for the whiners.
__________________
My computer gives me no problems now that I have a hammer in the room.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 03-Nov-2009, 21:29
TaraIkeda's Avatar
Parent Penguin
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 735
TaraIkeda hasn't been rated much yet
Default Re: Not a good start for Ubuntu Karmic

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sagemta View Post
I've been testing since M5 overall it has been problem free. The only real biggie to date has been when the Xorg1.7 no longer needed the xorg.conf & the devs removed sax for a bit. For me so far that's been the biggest problem. Even then it has only been a problem on my PC that uses the openchrome driver,VIA chipsets do that. I needed sax2 for it. So overall it looks like OpenSuse 11.2
will be excellent.
However, there's no accounting for the whiners.
Indeed, someone has to whine about something.
For me Karmic is fine peachy keen though I am gonna try out openSUSE 11.2
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 03-Nov-2009, 22:40
conram's Avatar
Wise Penguin
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,000
conram 's reputation will be famous soon enoughconram 's reputation will be famous soon enoughconram 's reputation will be famous soon enough
Default Re: Not a good start for Ubuntu Karmic

I'm almost tempted to try buntu but the whole drive is already reserved for the coming of openSUSE 11.2 goldmaster.
__________________
People who do not break things first will never learn to create anything
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 03-Nov-2009, 22:41
Puzzled Penguin
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 25
znmeb hasn't been rated much yet
Default Re: Not a good start for Ubuntu Karmic

Quote:
Originally Posted by TioDuke View Post
As some of you might already know, I am not an Ubuntu fan, however, and to be fair to them, the problem is not Ubuntu related. The X issue comes from an xorg-server update (version 1.7.1) and legacy nvidia (pre-190) and ati drivers. These propietary drivers have not been updated to work with the latest xorg-sever version. I have had the very same problem this weekend on Arch and had to downgrade xorg-server, xorg-server-utils and their dependencies to make my prehistoric FX5200 work in 3D again. Beware openSUSE users: if 11.2 comes with this very same xorg-server version and you plan to use propietary drivers for your nvidia/ati legacy GPUs, you'll run into the very same trouble and will have to either downgrade xorg-sever or use the nv/nouveau drivers until nvidia fixes the drivers (if ever). I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for ati either. We are all Linux users and we use the same packages, so we are in the same boat.
Ah ... that explains some things. Since this is an openSUSE forum, I won't say too much. I did a fresh install of Karmic on a spare partition last night. It came up with the open source "nv" driver at 800x600. Nothing I tried would get native resolution or even 1024x768 - I had to install the *proprietary* NVidia driver to get 1152x864. I had similar things happen on openSUSE 11.2 back around milestone 4 or 5, but it's been working fine with the "nv" driver since I started testing again at milestone 8.

I've been running both my desktop and laptop on openSUSE 11.2 since RC1 and everything works. I haven't gone to the trouble of doing "hard way" installs of the NVidia driver (desktop) or ATI driver (laptop), mostly because I don't currently do a lot of 3D stuff and I had some fairly severe (like re-install-worthy) issues with the ATI drivers on the laptop. I may risk the ATI on the laptop over the weekend, since it's dual-booted Windows Vista. ;-)
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 03-Nov-2009, 23:06
caf4926's Avatar
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The English Lake District. UK - GMT/BST
Posts: 12,927
caf4926 has a brilliant future with this reputationcaf4926 has a brilliant future with this reputationcaf4926 has a brilliant future with this reputationcaf4926 has a brilliant future with this reputationcaf4926 has a brilliant future with this reputationcaf4926 has a brilliant future with this reputationcaf4926 has a brilliant future with this reputationcaf4926 has a brilliant future with this reputationcaf4926 has a brilliant future with this reputationcaf4926 has a brilliant future with this reputationcaf4926 has a brilliant future with this reputation
Send a message via MSN to caf4926
Default Re: Not a good start for Ubuntu Karmic

Too much moaning about nothing IMO. For experimentations sake, I have tried most of the mainstream distros. They are all a little different but for me they all work just fine. True, you might have to configure some basics (and FYI, even the so called nvidia 'hard way', is not hard - seriously!). But compared to the likes of M$ installs - Linux is a doddle. Try installing Fedora 11 or 12, I did recently and honestly if I didn't need multi-media I had nothing I needed to do.

A good point was made by Jonathan_R - The more we get involved and the more of us that do it at development stage the better. I've had very little to report in bugs for openSUSE 11.2, it's mostly just worked for me.
__________________
Box: openSUSE 11.2 | (KDE4.3.3) | M2N4-SLI | AMD 64 X2 5200+ | nVidia 8500GT | 4GB RAM
Lap: openSUSE 11.2 | Celeron 550 | (KDE4.3.3)"3" | Intel 965 GM | Lenovo R61e | 3GB RAM
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 04-Nov-2009, 19:01
GofBorg's Avatar
Parent Penguin
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Delta Quadrant
Posts: 782
GofBorg hasn't been rated much yet
Default Re: Not a good start for Ubuntu Karmic

> What's your xorg-server version?

I'll have to check.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 04-Nov-2009, 19:45
Wise Penguin
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,026
consused hasn't been rated much yet
Default Re: Not a good start for Ubuntu Karmic

Quote:
Originally Posted by caf4926 View Post
Too much moaning about nothing IMO. For experimentations sake, I have tried most of the mainstream distros. They are all a little different but for me they all work just fine.
So basically you are saying that there is no room for improvement, and anyone who suggests that improvement is needed must be a moaner and a whiner. Is that about right?
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Bookmarks


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




 

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC2