openSUSE Forums > General Chit-Chat » NTFS vs ext3 ext4

Go Back   openSUSE Forums > General Chit-Chat
Forums FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


General Chit-Chat A friendly place to converse about your adventures with openSUSE, your weekend, your boss, your new car, and generally stuff that doesn't fit somewhere else (and we must ask: PLEASE do not post help questions here)

Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-Nov-2009, 18:38
wakou's Avatar
Busy Penguin
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 325
wakou hasn't been rated much yet
Default NTFS vs ext3 ext4

I am preparing to kick my XP install in to touch, so today I had some great fun pruning it with a large machete, deleting and uninstalling loads of old bloat. I started with 172Gb , now it is about 120Gb

Of the 120Gb, about 60Gb is music, radio, TV, Films and images, which I want to keep... As I said in an earlier thread this is on a 300Gb drive which I want to become my main drive, either by cloning my current openSuse 11.1, or making a fresh install of 11.2. What I intend now to do is put all of this "media" on to it's own partition. Is there any real disadvantage to keeping this as a NTFS, or any advantage to making it ext4? I will probably be accessing it from openSuse, but as far as I can see, openSuse copes perfectly well with read/writing to NTFS partitions, if I keep it NTFS, I can if needed access it from windows as well.....?
Any thoughts welcome as usual fellow penguins..... :-)
__________________

Currently trying 11.2/kde4/2.6.31.5-0.1/nvidia 190.42
11.1: kernel 2.6.27.29-0.1-pae: kde 3.5.10: nVidia driver 180.51: Compiz 0.8.2 Single core Athlon, 2Gb RAM, nVidia 6150SE
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-Nov-2009, 21:31
caf4926's Avatar
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The English Lake District. UK - GMT/BST
Posts: 12,859
caf4926 has a brilliant future with this reputationcaf4926 has a brilliant future with this reputationcaf4926 has a brilliant future with this reputationcaf4926 has a brilliant future with this reputationcaf4926 has a brilliant future with this reputationcaf4926 has a brilliant future with this reputationcaf4926 has a brilliant future with this reputationcaf4926 has a brilliant future with this reputationcaf4926 has a brilliant future with this reputationcaf4926 has a brilliant future with this reputationcaf4926 has a brilliant future with this reputation
Send a message via MSN to caf4926
Default Re: NTFS vs ext3 ext4

My only thought is, if you keep it ntfs and don't have winders installed - will it need defraging and if so how?
In my case. Pure Linux means just that and I kick to touch and M$ stuff.
__________________
Box: Fedora 11 | (KDE4.3.2) | M2N4-SLI | AMD 64 X2 5200+ | nVidia 8500GT | 4GB RAM
Lap: openSUSE 11.2 | Celeron 550 | (KDE4.3.3)"3" | Intel 965 GM | Lenovo R61e | 3GB RAM
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-Nov-2009, 05:07
microchip8's Avatar
Shaman Penguin
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: /dev/belgium
Posts: 2,179
microchip8 is a reputation jewel in the roughmicrochip8 is a reputation jewel in the roughmicrochip8 is a reputation jewel in the roughmicrochip8 is a reputation jewel in the roughmicrochip8 is a reputation jewel in the rough
Default Re: NTFS vs ext3 ext4

The only reason you'd want to keep it as NTFS is if you intend at some point to use it on a Windows machine. If not, then go with Ext4

And yes, NTFS will need defragging, no matter if you write to it from Linux or Windows. There are no defrag tools for NTFS on Linux, AFAIK
__________________
My site: http://microchip.bplaced.net
My repo: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/microchip8
SUSE Unbound Forum: http://suseunbound.lefora.com


Do coders dream of sheep() ?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-Nov-2009, 05:21
wakou's Avatar
Busy Penguin
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 325
wakou hasn't been rated much yet
Default Re: NTFS vs ext3 ext4

Hmmm, I don't think defrag will be a major issue, as this will be largely static storage, mebbe stuff will get deleted over time leaving fraggy holes in the fs, but as I say, I do not expect major traffic to or from the drive. There is of course a chance that Win 7 (now with snappy windows!! yaheyy! nobody thought of that before did they?) might turn out to be a good OS and I might want this stuff stored NTFS. Also it would be easier for the moment to create the new partition from MSXP and move the files to it also from within XP...
(or not really, thinking about it..)
__________________

Currently trying 11.2/kde4/2.6.31.5-0.1/nvidia 190.42
11.1: kernel 2.6.27.29-0.1-pae: kde 3.5.10: nVidia driver 180.51: Compiz 0.8.2 Single core Athlon, 2Gb RAM, nVidia 6150SE
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-Nov-2009, 05:25
microchip8's Avatar
Shaman Penguin
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: /dev/belgium
Posts: 2,179
microchip8 is a reputation jewel in the roughmicrochip8 is a reputation jewel in the roughmicrochip8 is a reputation jewel in the roughmicrochip8 is a reputation jewel in the roughmicrochip8 is a reputation jewel in the rough
Default Re: NTFS vs ext3 ext4

Then stick to NTFS
__________________
My site: http://microchip.bplaced.net
My repo: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/microchip8
SUSE Unbound Forum: http://suseunbound.lefora.com


Do coders dream of sheep() ?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-Nov-2009, 06:35
oldcpu's Avatar
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 10,656
oldcpu is rated a glorious beacon of lightoldcpu is rated a glorious beacon of lightoldcpu is rated a glorious beacon of lightoldcpu is rated a glorious beacon of lightoldcpu is rated a glorious beacon of lightoldcpu is rated a glorious beacon of lightoldcpu is rated a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: NTFS vs ext3 ext4

Quote:
Originally Posted by wakou View Post
There is of course a chance that Win 7 (now with snappy windows!! yaheyy! nobody thought of that before did they?) might turn out to be a good OS and I might want this stuff stored NTFS. Also it would be easier for the moment to create the new partition from MSXP and move the files to it also from within XP...
If you never plan to put Windoze on this PC, then I would recommend changing it away from NTFS. The risk (IMHO) of keeping NTFS is the NTFS partition could become "dirty" and the only way to deal with that is to boot to Windoze. But since you don't have Windoze you can't do that, and hence NTFS will stay dirty, and eventually you may not be able to access it.

However if you make the file system EXT3 or EXT4, and install Windoze on this PC, you will not be able to access the EXT3 or EXT4 from Windoze (at least not without hunting down, and possibly paying for and installing some custom software to give Windoze the access capability - and I have no idea about such software).

IMHO to make a good choice, you need to sort your future plans.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-Nov-2009, 11:16
michael_cheah's Avatar
Puzzled Penguin
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 46
michael_cheah hasn't been rated much yet
Default Re: NTFS vs ext3 ext4

Quote:
Originally Posted by oldcpu View Post

However if you make the file system EXT3 or EXT4, and install Windoze on this PC, you will not be able to access the EXT3 or EXT4 from Windoze (at least not without hunting down, and possibly paying for and installing some custom software to give Windoze the access capability - and I have no idea about such software).
I'm not trying to promote any particular software here, but just to point out that there are a few free (as in beers) software will allow you to read ext2/ext3 partition on windows.

Paragon ExtBrowser - Free Download

Ext2 IFS For Windows
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-Nov-2009, 11:27
wakou's Avatar
Busy Penguin
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 325
wakou hasn't been rated much yet
Default Re: NTFS vs ext3 ext4

TY Michael, I am aware of these, the one I used was to say the least a bit clunky, but it did work, Paragon make some very good SW's, I love their partitioning sw, also free.
__________________

Currently trying 11.2/kde4/2.6.31.5-0.1/nvidia 190.42
11.1: kernel 2.6.27.29-0.1-pae: kde 3.5.10: nVidia driver 180.51: Compiz 0.8.2 Single core Athlon, 2Gb RAM, nVidia 6150SE
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-Nov-2009, 11:46
microchip8's Avatar
Shaman Penguin
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: /dev/belgium
Posts: 2,179
microchip8 is a reputation jewel in the roughmicrochip8 is a reputation jewel in the roughmicrochip8 is a reputation jewel in the roughmicrochip8 is a reputation jewel in the roughmicrochip8 is a reputation jewel in the rough
Default Re: NTFS vs ext3 ext4

Quote:
Originally Posted by michael_cheah View Post
I'm not trying to promote any particular software here, but just to point out that there are a few free (as in beers) software will allow you to read ext2/ext3 partition on windows.

Paragon ExtBrowser - Free Download

Ext2 IFS For Windows
That wasn't really the point. The point is that if he takes this disk to a friend and it's in Ext4, if his friend uses Windows (most likely), he'll first has to hunt down additional software before his friend can read the disk, which isn't really very convenient, unless he always carries with him the software and each time installs it on friend's PCs which still is an ugly solution .... To my knowledge, if the uses "real" Ext4 (ie, not Ext4 in Ext3 compatibility mode without extents), there's currently no Windows software that will be able to read it. The Ext3 drivers provided by above software will not be able to manage a "true" Ext4 FS with extents turned on. There are also drivers for XFS on Windows but it's the same thing with Ext2/3/4, you need to install additional software (the drivers)

There could be such software that allows Win to read "true" Ext4, but I'm not aware of it as I don't care or deal with Windows
__________________
My site: http://microchip.bplaced.net
My repo: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/microchip8
SUSE Unbound Forum: http://suseunbound.lefora.com


Do coders dream of sheep() ?
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-Nov-2009, 12:57
michael_cheah's Avatar
Puzzled Penguin
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 46
michael_cheah hasn't been rated much yet
Default Re: NTFS vs ext3 ext4

Quote:
Originally Posted by microchip8 View Post
That wasn't really the point. The point is that if he takes this disk to a friend and it's in Ext4, if his friend uses Windows (most likely), he'll first has to hunt down additional software before his friend can read the disk, which isn't really very convenient, unless he always carries with him the software and each time installs it on friend's PCs which still is an ugly solution .... To my knowledge, if the uses "real" Ext4 (ie, not Ext4 in Ext3 compatibility mode without extents), there's currently no Windows software that will be able to read it. The Ext3 drivers provided by above software will not be able to manage a "true" Ext4 FS with extents turned on. There are also drivers for XFS on Windows but it's the same thing with Ext2/3/4, you need to install additional software (the drivers)

There could be such software that allows Win to read "true" Ext4, but I'm not aware of it as I don't care or deal with Windows
Yes, what you said is true. But I think the point is for openSUSE install on internal HDD one should always format the partition as ext3/ext4. If there is a need of transferring the file to another PC which only has Windows on it, I always copies the file into my external HDD which is NTFS. FAT32 will works as well.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Bookmarks


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




 

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC2