openSUSE Forums > General Chit-Chat » Ubuntu's and openSUSE's GNOME implementation

Go Back   openSUSE Forums > General Chit-Chat
Forums FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


General Chit-Chat A friendly place to converse about your adventures with openSUSE, your weekend, your boss, your new car, and generally stuff that doesn't fit somewhere else (and we must ask: PLEASE do not post help questions here)

Reply
Page 1 of 4 1 23 Last »
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 18-Oct-2009, 06:13
BenderBendingRodriguez's Avatar
Wise Penguin
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,655
BenderBendingRodriguez hasn't been rated much yet
Default Ubuntu's and openSUSE's GNOME implementation

Recently i was testing Ubuntu 9.10 Beta and then i tested 11.2's GNOME. And i must say that Ubuntu's GNOME implementation is a lot more polished than SUSE's. And while i do not intend to move to gnome or Ubuntu then i must say it looks really nice and can understand Ubuntu's gnome users saying that Ubuntu is so nice. Fortunatelly i am hooked up to KDE 4.3.1 and am never going back to gnome

State your experiences with Ubuntu's gnome implementation.

P.S. It is funny that despite linux division in Novell gaining more money every year they still have so few people to work on it... We can see what a good team can do to the distro if they concentrate on something (Ubuntu and gnome). I really consider running Ubuntu 9.10 in a virtual machine to check it.
__________________
How does a linux geek make love??

- unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; umount; sleep;
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 18-Oct-2009, 08:43
Wise Penguin
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,026
consused hasn't been rated much yet
Default Re: Ubuntu's and openSUSE's GNOME implementation

Does ubuntu gnome still have that brownie look about it?

Did you try kubuntu 9.10 in a vm (or real)?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 18-Oct-2009, 09:18
BenderBendingRodriguez's Avatar
Wise Penguin
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,655
BenderBendingRodriguez hasn't been rated much yet
Default Re: Ubuntu's and openSUSE's GNOME implementation

I tried it in real as a live CD, after that i am testing it in a VM. It's not so brown anymore There are some shades of brown but it looks nice Login screen login looks great for example.
__________________
How does a linux geek make love??

- unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; umount; sleep;
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 18-Oct-2009, 09:23
Wise Penguin
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,026
consused hasn't been rated much yet
Default Re: Ubuntu's and openSUSE's GNOME implementation

Thanks BBR, ok on colour, but I think you may have missed the small k in my Kubuntu 9.10 question.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 18-Oct-2009, 09:25
microchip8's Avatar
Shaman Penguin
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: /dev/belgium
Posts: 2,194
microchip8 is a reputation jewel in the roughmicrochip8 is a reputation jewel in the roughmicrochip8 is a reputation jewel in the roughmicrochip8 is a reputation jewel in the roughmicrochip8 is a reputation jewel in the rough
Default Re: Ubuntu's and openSUSE's GNOME implementation

Quote:
Originally Posted by BenderBendingRodriguez View Post
I tried it in real as a live CD, after that i am testing it in a VM. It's not so brown anymore There are some shades of brown but it looks nice Login screen login looks great for example.
Seems Ubuntu didn't wash its panties enough as there are still visible skid marks left over

Also, GNOME?.... Wutz dat? O.o
__________________
My site: http://microchip.bplaced.net
My repo: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/microchip8
SUSE Unbound Forum: http://suseunbound.lefora.com


Do coders dream of sheep() ?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 18-Oct-2009, 09:50
BenderBendingRodriguez's Avatar
Wise Penguin
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,655
BenderBendingRodriguez hasn't been rated much yet
Default Re: Ubuntu's and openSUSE's GNOME implementation

You're right, i missed the k in the question. I am not intending to try kubuntu as their implementation of KDE was always lousy as hell. For me SUSE got great KDE, YaST that kicks ass and lots of repositories i could use

I tried last time kubuntu in 9.04 but it feels underloved

While KDE in ubuntu sucks then i must say Gnome shines. And i must admit they are going in the right direction with that distro.

P.S. Oh, one thing, i would really like to see openSUSE become a deb distro
__________________
How does a linux geek make love??

- unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; umount; sleep;
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 18-Oct-2009, 11:42
didencool's Avatar
Busy Penguin
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ukraine/mk/pervomaysk
Posts: 381
didencool hasn't been rated much yet
Default Re: Ubuntu's and openSUSE's GNOME implementation

BenderBendingRodriguez wrote:

> P.S. Oh, one thing, i would really like to see openSUSE become a deb
> distro


auhm ???
why did you think, this is important?
if somebody wants it can use Debian, ubuntu, mint, 64 studio and much
more...

--
WBR
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 18-Oct-2009, 11:49
BenderBendingRodriguez's Avatar
Wise Penguin
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,655
BenderBendingRodriguez hasn't been rated much yet
Default Re: Ubuntu's and openSUSE's GNOME implementation

From what i've heard debian has better dependency resolving. I might be wrong but that's why ubuntu has for years live upgrades and SUSE not?
__________________
How does a linux geek make love??

- unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; umount; sleep;
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 18-Oct-2009, 11:50
Wise Penguin
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,824
Akoellh is a reputation jewel in the roughAkoellh is a reputation jewel in the roughAkoellh is a reputation jewel in the roughAkoellh is a reputation jewel in the roughAkoellh is a reputation jewel in the rough
Default Re: Ubuntu's and openSUSE's GNOME implementation

Quote:
Originally Posted by BenderBendingRodriguez View Post
P.S. Oh, one thing, i would really like to see openSUSE become a deb distro
So you really want a package format which had no real improvements for years (maybe there were some changes in the last few months/one year)and gives a lot of problems with consistency if one of the scripts is failing?

Search Debian/*Buntu forum of your choice for that, you will find a lot of funny threads which could be resolved in rpm with one command.

I certainly don't.
__________________
“Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.” (R.J. Hanlon)
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 18-Oct-2009, 11:56
BrownieCat's Avatar
Explorer Penguin
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Falcon Complex, Rawalpindi
Posts: 124
BrownieCat hasn't been rated much yet
Default Re: Ubuntu's and openSUSE's GNOME implementation

It's simple. If you like GNOME and hate KDE, by all means use Ubuntu. If you are a KDE fan and hate GNOME, then use openSUSE, or Kubuntu.
By the way, the implementation of KDE 4.3 in Kubuntu 9.10 (the upcoming version) seems nice.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 1 of 4 1 23 Last »

Bookmarks


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




 

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC2