|
||||||
| Forums FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| General Chit-Chat A friendly place to converse about your adventures with openSUSE, your weekend, your boss, your new car, and generally stuff that doesn't fit somewhere else (and we must ask: PLEASE do not post help questions here) |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Check this out -> Linux Magazine
Another small victory for Open Source altho it is their own product
__________________
Lord Flasheart: Always treat your plane like you treat your woman. Lieutenant George: Take her home at the weekend to meet your mother? Lord Flasheart: No, get inside her five times a day and take her to heaven and back! |
|
|||
|
That sounds nice, but I have doubts about the veracity of the article in some respects, especially as it seems to be repeating second hand news. The original German article makes no mention of a 10 day deadline that I can see. One has to be careful about sloppy journalism whatever the source.
|
|
|||
|
Hmm...
I'm not sure what I think of that. I can see very good reasons for forcing your employees to use open formats, but I don't like the idea of forcing them to use your own software - it smacks of lack of faith in it, and seems to commit the very sins of distortion of free decision that people hate Microsoft for in the first place. I guess you can fight fire with fire, and I guess they could make the case that by forcing their employees to use it, it will rapidly improve (who better to report bugs?), but still... if you've got a few bob lying around (IBM aren't who they used to be - but they're no upstart either), then just stump up the development, make it work so people *want* to use it... Heck, you could offer cash incentives to all staff that submit patches or report legitimate bugs / well thought out wishlist items... That'd get 'em using it (and make it work!)... ![]() ETA - re patches, I didn't actually realise it wasn't open source. But there are reports they're intending to incorporate later open office code into it. That must mean they're opening the source, no? |
|
|||
|
It doesn't sound like IBM which generally works over long timescales. From some recent figures, I understand that only about 7% of their desktops run Linux - but of course this could simply mean they are not 'upgrading' to MS Office 2007 on any desktop.
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|