|
||||||
| Forums FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| General Chit-Chat A friendly place to converse about your adventures with openSUSE, your weekend, your boss, your new car, and generally stuff that doesn't fit somewhere else (and we must ask: PLEASE do not post help questions here) |
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
++ respect to growbag, having to log-in every time I look away, close session etc is a proper pain, I have to re-size etc as well...... There is no need! (?) (Is there?)
I have asked before and it was explained that it was to do with access to Novell. I never wanted access to Novell, just the forum.
__________________
Currently trying 11.2/kde4/2.6.31.5-0.1/nvidia 190.42 11.1: kernel 2.6.27.29-0.1-pae: kde 3.5.10: nVidia driver 180.51: Compiz 0.8.2 Single core Athlon, 2Gb RAM, nVidia 6150SE |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
People who do not break things first will never learn to create anything |
|
||||
|
Yes, my page is set to default. But it's always been on that, nothing has changed, well, I certainly didn't change anything
.It just now asked me to log in, but I clicked on login and it didn't send me to the login page, just automatically showed me as logged in again! Odd behaviour, but nice .I'm wondering if it's something to do with the power outages in Nürnberg they were having. Maybe they should be permanent .
__________________
HP dv6645, Nvidia 8400m-gs, KDE 4.
|
|
|||
|
On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 20:36:01 +0000, wakou wrote:
> I have asked before and it was explained that it was to do with access > to Novell. I never wanted access to Novell, just the forum. Because it's all one authentication system. Since the login grants access to these forums and to (for those who own Novell products) information on their product licenses and other sensitive customer company information, the login has to be set to expire so as to not compromise that data. Jim -- Jim Henderson openSUSE Forums Moderator |
|
|||
|
to me, it is pure stupid to hamstring all openSUSE forum users just in
case we _might_ also have sensitive customer information over on Novell...and might be stupid enough to log on and THEN walk away from our computer, in an uncontrolled office...where lurking in the corner is someone just waiting to steal some Novell software, or *what*?? personally, if i ever had a need to access Novell i'd be doing it with a different account, with a stronger user ID and strong password.. i do wonder just how many folks here actually need to protect their Novell secrets? [i would start a poll but i know the decision has been made to use Novell's chained password thingy....i suspect that decision was made so it might help Novell in SELLING their software <http://www.novell.com/solutions/identity-and-access/> ...now we have both the Studio and the build a geeko requiring THREE different logins...but, still we have to here be tied to an unneeded and mostly unwanted commercial account protecting system..] but, i've been though this before: my online broker account (with real money at stake) allows a 12 hour sign in...and, several bank accounts allow 6+ hours of sign in (google is what TWO WEEKS)...but, openSUSE forums are not at all open, past one hour... duh! -- platinum |
|
|||
|
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 08:41:43 +0000, platinum wrote:
> now we have both > the Studio and the build a geeko requiring THREE different logins The reasoning (which I'm not involved in - just the messenger here) is to reduce the number of logins to avoid complaints like this. And I would actually prefer that Studio and "Build a Geeko" integrated as well. Jim -- Jim Henderson openSUSE Forums Moderator |
|
|||
|
and, if they integrated ALL sign-ins that would at least strengthen
their reasoning... as it is.... well, you can see.. -- platinum |
|
|||
|
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:34:19 +0000, platinum wrote:
> and, if they integrated ALL sign-ins that would at least strengthen > their reasoning... I agree. As I thought about it a bit more, the login was already integrated for the Novell forums, so the implementation for OSF was already implemented. A case of "we can't control these other things, but we can control what we do". Since it's maintained by the same technical team, two different implementations would also mean more work to manage. > as it is.... well, you can see.. Yup. We control only what we control. Jim -- Jim Henderson openSUSE Forums Moderator |
![]() |
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|