
Originally Posted by
PGHammer
IPv6 is enabled in KDE (and in Linux going forward) for a reason - IPv4 exhaustion will happen. (That's not merely a possibility, but a certainty.) NAT is a kludge (an elegant one, but still a kludge), and merely staves off the inevitable (like King Canute and his broom vs. the tide). I have Brits in the heritage; however, I have no wish to find myself being another Canute. Besides, I find that Linux distributions in general support IPv6 (and the just-as-elegant kludge of ipv6-in-ipv4 tunnelling, which is the default IPv6 deployment today) better than Windows (even Windows 7). Most free tunnelbrokers (including the three best-known ones - Freenet6, Hurricane Electric's tunnelbroker.net and SixxS) have RPMs for Linux distributions that require them (SixxS, which I use, has a package set for development distributions, which I use for 11.2 RC2 x64). Heck, Debian has gone one better and included AICCU (which supports most 6to4 tunnel types and most brokers, both free and fee) in their repos (and Ubuntu/Kubuntu actually has IPv6-accessible repositories in the US).
So, I wouldn't be so quick to dispense with IPv6. Temporarily, but definitely not permanently.
Bookmarks