Go Back   openSUSE Forums > Archives > SLS Archives > ARCHIVES - Linux Tweaks > ARCHIVES - Tips, Tricks & Tweaks
Forums FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


ARCHIVES - Tips, Tricks & Tweaks Post your tips, tricks and tweaks about SuSE Linux in here. Please do not ask questions here - this is for factual information

 
Page 5 of 5 « First 34 5
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 25-Jun-2006, 01:06
guru
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs down

Quote:
...
It's the only package management tool I know of at present which allows one to manage source packages in the same manner as rpms.
Removal of a package is as easy as 'epkg -e <packagename>' to remove the package and its symlinks.
[/b]
Note that such systems (encap, autopackage, klik, or even building+installing from sources) are totally not the same thing as RPMs.

Most specifically, you should know that when you use other package management backends on an RPM distribution (such as SUSE Linux, Fedora Core, etc...), none of them is aware of the other.
If you install a "package" with epkg, it won't handle dependencies properly, as epkg is not aware of your RPM database. The opposite is true as well, unfortunately: if you have something installed with epkg, and some RPM requires that software, RPM will not be aware that you have it installed with encap.

encap/epkg might be more interesting than just building+installing from sources "manually", but that's it, it's totally not integrated nor aware of RPM, and you might end up with a big mess unless you really know what you are doing in the first place.

And while some users might think that RPM dependencies are a pain, it is a good thing, really ;-)

Definitely would not recommend such an approach for anything but really experienced users.
Always try to install an RPM that has been built for your SUSE Linux version - if you can't find an RPM of some piece of software, contact me or the Packman team ;-)
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 28-Nov-2006, 03:45
felipe1982
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
good for a sticky? yeah right! this post was freakin' awesome! thanks a ton! like you said, installing from source is nearly impossible to catch all the files ( but oh how i love my source ) at least now i can compile it to my own processor instead of using i386.rpms -- i now have i686.rpms hahaha... i shall rule the world with my i686 packages... :lol: well... then again...

thanks for the awesome post ( again )!
[/b]
Are i386 rpms in anyway "worse" than i686 rpms (i have a i686 processor)?
 
Page 5 of 5 « First 34 5

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




 

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC2