Quote:
|
I downloaded and installed the newer driver alsa-driver-1.0.14rc4.tar.bz2. Could not find same format file for tools and firmware. [/b]
|
Why 1.0.14.rc4? That is release candidate (RC) 4 prior to the released version of alsa-1.0.14, which was released a long time ago. Currently alsa is up to version 1.0.15. I think my post may have confused you .... there is no need to load 1.0.14.rc4 ... rather one should load a stable version of alsa AFTER 1.0.14rc4, which means either alsa-1.0.14 or alsa-1.0.15.
Packman have a v.1.0.14 rpm version of alsa for openSUSE-10.2. Hence my recommendation:
Please, can you consider that recommendation of mine?
Also, further to your post:
Quote:
|
I downloaded and installed the newer driver alsa-driver-1.0.14rc4.tar.bz2. Could not find same format file for tools and firmware. [/b]
|
you are downloading a tar.bz2 file. That is commonly referred to as a "tarball" file, and it is not the same as an rpm file. Typically an rpm contains compiled executables. While a tarball typically contains source code and requires that you compile, and typically that is best done ONLY after one has checked to see if there are any rpm files available. In this case, there are rpms for alsa-1.0.14 (on Packman), and rpms for alsa-1.0.15 on the unofficial SUSE update site:
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/..._Update/x86_64/
... now it may be necessary to take a tarball, and compile alsa, but if we have to cross that bridge, we should first get more information on your hardware, and also go for the latest alsa, and not some older alsa.
Now if those alsa versions (1.0.14 or 1.0.15) don't work for you, then there are a couple of scripts that I can have you run that will provide more diagnostic information on your setup. And perhaps only then (but not now) it might be useful to consider a custom compile.