openSUSE Forums > Applications » PAE vs Default?....

Go Back   openSUSE Forums > Applications
Forums FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Applications Questions about desktops (KDE, Gnome, XFCE, etc.), software applications (configuration, usage, bugs, documentation)

Reply
Page 1 of 3 1 23
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-Nov-2009, 16:58
Student Penguin
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 61
VcDeveloper1 hasn't been rated much yet
Question PAE vs Default?....

What is the advantage of using the PAE configuration than the default and How can I change or edit the boot menu that gives me the options?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-Nov-2009, 17:14
microchip8's Avatar
Shaman Penguin
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: /dev/belgium
Posts: 2,203
microchip8 is a reputation jewel in the roughmicrochip8 is a reputation jewel in the roughmicrochip8 is a reputation jewel in the roughmicrochip8 is a reputation jewel in the roughmicrochip8 is a reputation jewel in the rough
Default Re: PAE vs Default?....

Physical Address Extension - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

you can install it in parallel to default and it should add an entry automatically to your boot menu
__________________
My site: http://microchip.bplaced.net
My repo: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/microchip8
SUSE Unbound Forum: http://suseunbound.lefora.com


Do coders dream of sheep() ?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-Nov-2009, 17:16
BenderBendingRodriguez's Avatar
Wise Penguin
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,655
BenderBendingRodriguez hasn't been rated much yet
Default Re: PAE vs Default?....

It is not the configuation that changes but the kernel. The PAE allows to have more than 4GB of memory and additionally activates the NX (No Execute bit) in CPUs that support this, otherwise there is no difference. So it is a bit better to have the PAE kernel for just this NX bit because if you have more than 4 GB of memory then i recommend using 64 bit system (anyway i recommend it always even if you don't have that much memory as most of the CPU's support it and are more efficient thanks to additional registers used).
__________________
How does a linux geek make love??

- unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; umount; sleep;
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-Nov-2009, 19:03
Student Penguin
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 61
VcDeveloper1 hasn't been rated much yet
Default Re: PAE vs Default?....

Thanks for the replies and clearing that up for me!

I have it installed now and I would like to change the boot menu to look a bit nicer. Either where is the config file or is there a module I can use?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-Nov-2009, 19:36
Confuseling's Avatar
Wise Penguin
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,268
Confuseling is on a distinguished reputation roadConfuseling is on a distinguished reputation road
Default Re: PAE vs Default?....

You can do it in YaST somewhere or other.

My personal preference is to directly edit (as root) /boot/grub/menu.lst, and you should back it up first.

There are blocks of information relating to each menu choice - each will begin 'title'. They appear in the order they are in the file. Notice the 'default' setting near the top, which you may wish to adjust, counts from 0.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-Nov-2009, 19:48
Wise Penguin
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,026
consused hasn't been rated much yet
Default Re: PAE vs Default?....

I also prefer to manually edit menu.lst. DO keep a separate copy after editing of menu.lst, somewhere safe. When kernel updates are applied, menu.lst is automatically updated to reflect that, and sometimes mistakes occur or boot parameters get dropped.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 08-Nov-2009, 00:45
Student Penguin
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 61
VcDeveloper1 hasn't been rated much yet
Default Re: PAE vs Default?....

Ok thanks! I appreciate your help!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 08-Nov-2009, 08:32
yu210148's Avatar
Explorer Penguin
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 154
yu210148 hasn't been rated much yet
Default Re: PAE vs Default?....

Confuseling wrote:

>
> You can do it in YaST somewhere or other.
>


If you would like to do it with yast it's in Yast-->System-->Boot Loader

--
kev.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 08-Nov-2009, 08:34
wakou's Avatar
Busy Penguin
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 345
wakou hasn't been rated much yet
Default Re: PAE vs Default?....

Could you go in to a bit more detail please. My system grub menu defaults to PAE,but I have only 2Gb memory. Is there any advantage to making the plain vanilla kernel the default, or should I just leave alone?
__________________

Currently trying 11.2/kde4/2.6.31.5-0.1/nvidia 190.42
11.1: kernel 2.6.27.29-0.1-pae: kde 3.5.10: nVidia driver 180.51: Compiz 0.8.2 Single core Athlon, 2Gb RAM, nVidia 6150SE
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 08-Nov-2009, 09:18
BenderBendingRodriguez's Avatar
Wise Penguin
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,655
BenderBendingRodriguez hasn't been rated much yet
Default Re: PAE vs Default?....

That is fine,leave it as it is, changing to default won't bring you any differences, additionally with the PAE kernel you are safer (NoExecute bit).
__________________
How does a linux geek make love??

- unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; umount; sleep;
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 1 of 3 1 23

Bookmarks

Tags
pae


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




 

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC2