View Single Post
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 18-Dec-2008, 04:03
oldcpu's Avatar
oldcpu oldcpu is online now
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 10,711
oldcpu is rated a glorious beacon of lightoldcpu is rated a glorious beacon of lightoldcpu is rated a glorious beacon of lightoldcpu is rated a glorious beacon of lightoldcpu is rated a glorious beacon of lightoldcpu is rated a glorious beacon of lightoldcpu is rated a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: Suggestions for openSUSE-11.1 Newbie Installation sticki

Quote:
Originally Posted by tsu2 View Post
- For any other download method, the checksum (MD5) check is critical. For Bittorrent, it's unnecessary and overkill because a Torrent download automatically checksums every one of the hundreds or thousands of pieces as well as the final re-constructed file. The only way a torrent download can be damaged is if the original source file is damaged.
I do not believe this to be accurate.

I have downloaded torrent files that were corrupted, but the torrent application gave me a completed message.

Later I realized the file was corrupted, and I then forced (on the bittorrent application) the torrent checksum, and then, and only then, did the torrent application pickup on the fact that the downloaded file was corrupted.

I have seen this behaviour on both ktorrent and azureus. This is not common, but it does happen. I've had this happen about 1/2 dozen times over the course of the past few years.

Hence I believe the md5sum check of the iso file is still useful, even for iso files downloaded by torrent.
Reply With Quote